What is on my mind, is something that is on my mind for years now. It is something I read a few years ago in a book by a Dutch writer, George Bode. His thinking is mainly based on the thoughts of a French philosopher, Jean Carteret. As far as I know, nothing is written on paper by Carteret, but Bode wrote a book called: “Het poetische denken van Jean Carteret”. A book in which Bode tries to give an impression of the thought process of Carteret.

Deeply hidden in that book was the following (English translation of the Dutch writings of a French thoughtprocess, so something might get lost here):

“At a certain moment Carteret was very impressed by a line in Jungs book ‘Man and his symbols’: Matter and psyche are two aspects of one and the same phenomenon.

Superficially from this comes that matter obvious is the visable side of the psyche.

But if one stays in this stage, it becomes a formula and becomes a presence where you cannot go about. That never happened to Carteret, therefore was his analysing quality to good.

His second association by the phrase of Jung was: matter and psyche are sort of the same, but matter is also energy.

Coming from this scientific fact, he then formulated: the energy in the matter can be seen as workable infinity, an infinity in action. And matter is a condition of limitation.

So there is a couple of matter/energy and besides that there is also the psyche. But psyche also is invisible like energy. Psyche, which is an inner concept, asks for a fourth concept, that is to the psyche what energy is to matter.

The search for this fourth concept could start, a search which could take weeks, sometimes even months. But also sometimes only a blink of an eye.

The latter was wat happend here. Suddenly he thought of something from the psychiater Lacan about language. And apart from how Lacan meant that, he had found his fourth concept to use in a dialectic.

He formulated it about this: Matter is the ‘condition’ of ‘limitation’ from an ‘infinity’ in ‘action’ (energy). Psyche is just like energy an ‘infinity’ but a ‘condition’ of infinity. And language is the ‘condition’ in ‘action’.

Because the psyche is the oceanic infinity and the ocean does not move, while on the contrairy the rivers do. So the psyche is the ‘condition’ of ‘infinity’ of which language is the ‘condition’ in ‘action’.

So on one hand as a physical aspect of the world, there is the couple matter/energy: a condition of limitation and an infinity in action.

And on the other hand, complemantairy to that and as a metafysical aspect, there is the couple psyche/language: a condition of infinity and a limitation that can work on that actively.

The result of that, if maximum, is poetry and if this does not work then there is the language that totaly drawns in the actual unspeakable of the psyche, which gives the mystical.”

This kept getting around and around in my head for years, and as I was searching for a language to describe the human development, I decided to use body for matter. For energy I used spirit and the language became mind. The psyche Carteret talks about is something I thought could be translated with soul.

For action and condition I used active and passive, and infinity and limitation became potential and structure.

Spirit = active + potential
Body = passive + structure
Mind = active + structure
Soul = passive + potential

Or in one line: The Body is the passive structure of the active potential Spirit, as the Mind is the active structure of the passive potential Soul.

4 Responses to “Mind”

  1. rambansal said

    Dear Annemieke,
    Though the subject matter is not of homeopathy but I read it carefully for its producing resonance in my mind. I had been studying Nature probably like you do to reach to the bottom of it. For this purpose I have started a blog in which I mentioned very briefly about fundamental elements of Nature :
    In near future I intend to discuss this in greater detail. This interested me in your write up on matter, energy, psyche etc. Keep up such thoughts to inspire me.

  2. rambansal said

    Further, on mind I have my another blog
    Please see if it look relevent to you.

  3. Annemieke said

    Rambansal, thank you for the links. It seems very interesting and indeed, as it looks, very much in line with my thinking.

  4. I am very informed by your website about homeopathy and the elements.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s